 |
Minutes Archive |
|
|
Board of Health
Minutes
Calhoun County Board of Health
Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2006
ATTENDANCE
| Board of Health |
Health Department |
| Larry Anderson |
Dottie-Kay Bowersox |
| Kathy Foerster |
Amy Latham |
| Byron McDonald |
Brigette Reichenbaugh |
| Ben Miller |
Mike Waite |
| Dr. Jeffrey Mitchell |
|
| Ken Ponds |
|
| Rick Tsoumas |
|
| |
|
| Calhoun County |
Other |
| Jim Latham |
Bill Schroer |
| Nancy Mullett |
|
| Greg Purcell |
|
Anderson called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m.
Motioned for approval of the agenda. McDonald moved. Ponds supported.
All in favor.
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion for approval. McDonald moved. Tsoumas approved. All in favor.
HEALTH OFFICER’S REPORT
Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program
Mullet presented the Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program (BCCCP)
agreement. Mullet stated there is not a contract available today. Per
conversations with Kalamazoo, a contract is not mandatory; however, the
Health Department (HD) requires Board approval for the program transfer.
Mullet presented the operation of the BCCCP program for further
understanding by the BOH. No local dollars follow the program, CCPHD
will have no hands on after the transfer, but CCPHD will assist in the
transition of the program (calls and clients).
Foerster asked if in 2009 we want the program back,
can we get it back. Mullet answered yes, it is possible but the
existence of the program depends solely on State funding continuation.
Foerster also asked about the Komen Foundation allocated dollars. The
Komen Foundation requires that Komen dollars must be used in SW Michigan
(includes Calhoun County).
McDonald asked if we spoke to members of the
community (Battle Creek Community Foundation (BCCF), partners, etc.).
Waite stated that Bowersox spoke to the BCCF and guaranteed the Board
that the services to the women will not change, only the location.
Miller questioned the budget/staffing impact
statement in resolution 8-2006. Waite clarified the budget and staff
time associated with the dollars. In order to see additional clients,
more staff is needed. If you choose not to transfer the program, then
the BOH requires BOC involvement -- program requires additional funds to
operate. We are not transferring any employees or dollars. This is a
programming decision for the HD. We can revisit at a future time but the
plan is to relinquish the program permanently. Bowersox stated that
community partners (BCCF, etc.) do not want to fund a program that can
be transferred and clients will continue to receive the same service at
a much lower cost.
Tsoumas stated that he serves on many of those boards
and funders will not pay for something that will continue if
transferred.
Mullet stated that if we want to review the quality
of the program after transfer, it can be mutually agreed upon that
Calhoun County review. But Mullet states that she feels it will not take
a long time and Kalamazoo’s reputation, within the different counties
currently administered, is very positive.
Bowersox stated that there are State program mandates
and the State indicated that there are no quality issues with Kalamazoo.
She also stated that she spoke with the BCCCF and they are very
supportive of the transfer of the program to Kalamazoo as long as the
Komen foundation dollars are kept.
Miller stated that we collaborate when needed. But at
some time we have to decide the quality and manner a program is
provided. Miller also stated that we find a way to maintain the program
here in Calhoun County and that he will not support here or at the
commissioner level. Ponds stated that the program or clients are not
leaving Calhoun County.
Bowersox stated that the nurse practitioner (NP) who
serves in this program is retiring in January. Again, a NP is required
for operation of this program. Past part-time NP hiring attempts have
proved unsuccessful. Tsoumas motioned approval of resolution 8-2006.
Miller requested roll call: Anderson: Yes; Mitchell, Yes; Tsoumas, Yes;
Ponds, Yes; McDonald No; Foerster, Yes; Miller, No. Motioned approved of
transfer of the BCCCP program to Kalamazoo County Human Services
Department. 5-2.
Mullet stated that this transfer does not involve any
local money in the transfer and does not require BOC approval. Mullet
clarified that there is no pass through, no connection with the HD,
there are no local dollars, no reporting requirements, no switching
employee relationship, and the State will mandate the program with
Kalamazoo. Kalamazoo will “do there thing” with the providers and Family
Health Center (FHC). The original discussions included CCPHD performing
case management. That has been rectified. There are no contracts with
the other Kalamazoo administered counties.
Purcell clarified the resolution that states
approving an agreement with Kalamazoo County. Bowersox stated that we
were hoping to transfer the program June 1st. Tsoumas asked if it is
possible to approach the State if we would consider running the program
in its entirety here again. Bowersox stated yes, we could approach the
State if we wanted the program back.
Tsoumas asked again for FHC to present to the Board
and that we have a bigger issue if we can’t entrust FHC to provide the
same services we do. Miller and McDonald feel that there is no need for
FHC to present.
Ponds motioned that Mullet develop a written
agreement/letter of understanding for BOC for approval. This agreement
will contain a checks and balance statement for FHC. Mullet stated that
checks and balance points will completed at the end of September and at
the end of each fiscal year. Or if there is a noncompliance report, the
report will trigger immediate discussion.
All in favor of the motion to have the letter of
understanding presented to the BOC. The agreement will be sent to BOH
members but the BOC will have final say. All in favor. Approved
unanimously.
Tobacco Resolution
The students that were present at the BOH will present to the BOC
either June 1st or June 15th.
FINANCIAL OFFICER’S REPORT
McDonald asked that the asterisks be placed alongside the mandated
programs. He also asked about the Nurse Manager position. Bowersox
stated that upon review of the 2006-2007 budget and after further
discussion with Marshall Administration, the Nurse Manager position will
remain vacant.
Latham clarified the emergency facility use
agreement. Tsoumas asked if we have these facilities in place. Latham
stated that we have five dispensing sites in Calhoun County. Tsoumas
asked for clarification of the action today. Latham stated that this
agreement allows us to go forth when speaking to other organizations
about becoming a dispensing site. Anderson asked who are the sites and
to see the master agreement.
Tsoumas asked if there is a subcommittee. Latham
answered there is a county initiative that focuses on county emergency
preparedness, although not health specific. Present the agreement at the
next meeting for approval.
Purcell stated that we are approving a template not
the individual agreements with providers. Dispensing sites are
designated (three in Battle Creek, one in Marshall, and one in Albion).
Tsoumas asked Latham to present the overall emergency preparedness plan
summary at the next meeting.
Agreement discussion
Purcell feels that the BOH should have a copy of all agreements that are
presented to the BOH for approval, excluding State and Federal
contracts. Mitchell stated that if he’s being asked to approve a concept
a summary memo is fine. But if a contract is presented for BOH approval,
the BOH would like to have the entire contract. Tsoumas clarified again
that all agreements and contracts be summarized, but that all non-State
and non-Federal contracts be provided to the BOH.
BOARD EDUCATION AND DISCUSSION
Health Officer Evaluation Committee Appointment
In conjunction with the BOC, Ponds, Foerster, and Mitchell expressed
interest in evaluation Bowersox, Health Officer.
Board Governance and Strategic Planning Retreat Report (Schroer)
Schroer stated that according to the governance model, all contracts
that are presented to the leadership go through a screen test (mission,
etc.) and the Board will hold the leadership accountable. If the Board
approves the contracts, yes, the Board should review them. But the Board
should not be approving contracts.
The feeling during the retreat was many community
members and partners have no idea of what the HD does or is supposed to
be doing. From a funder perspective there is a compliance/accountability
issue. Mitchell suggested that we combine Long Range Objectives (LRO) 1
and 2. He feels that LRO 4 is an outcome. Schroer stated that typically,
LROs do not have verbs (e.g., LRO 4: Have a rapid, flexible response
force).
The next step is establishing task forces for each
objective on a one-year basis. Task forces are experts that are
responsible for each task. Miller asked for clarification (e.g., LRO 1:
includes both direct service and health education). Tsoumas stated that
these objectives will allow us to meet all services (direct service,
health education, and serve as public health leader in the County).
Mitchell stated that most individuals in the retreat felt that we are
doing a good job at the micro level but not at the macro level. Mitchell
asked for clarification of LRO 3. Schroer clarified that the intention
of this comment was to have more diversity of staff (Health Department,
RHA, etc.).
Set a portion of the agenda to strategic planning.
Bowersox and Schroer will begin working on task force assignments.
Mitchell asked about program compliance. Mitchell
feels that we have too many programs to oversee. He would like to know
how we got out of compliance and what we are doing to fix. Approximate
number of county residents served for each non-mandated program.
McDonald asked about the Health Partnership update.
Bowersox stated that Nicole Boyd, Council of Advisors Chair, and
Bowersox interviewed two more candidates, one of which was an
African-American candidate. Boyd and Bowersox determined that to-date
their original candidate is best suited for this position.
McDonald motioned for adjournment. All in favor. Meeting adjourned
10:00 a.m.
|